Meet Tarindaro

Tarindaro is the head of a family of five in rural, northwest Bangladesh.

When we met him in 2012, he was working as a day labourer in agriculture. As the sole income earner, he brought in 100 - 250 taka (85p - £2.14) per day. The work was seasonal and unreliable, which meant he often took out loans to cover the cost of basic food items such as rice and vegetables.

The family lived in a one-room earthen house, only 7.5m2 in size with no personal water source, no access to sanitation facilities and no electricity. They were chosen by their community to work with us and co-design a new prototype house to improve living conditions.

(Photo: J. Ashbridge)

(Photo: J. Ashbridge)

Tarindaro worked full time on the project, alongside our construction staff, to build his own home. He was involved in all stages from design and purchase of materials to construction and finishing. Tarindaro is now the biggest advocate in the area for improved building techniques. He also has the skills and expertise to work in construction ensuring a consistent source of income for his family.

Read more about the project.

 

Author: J. Ashbridge

International development conference

AzuKo hosted a stall during this year’s International Development Society (IDS) conference, ‘Looking Back, Moving Forward’ at Newcastle University. IDS is an entirely student led organisation which aims to raise awareness of global issues and ensure they remain on the university and public agenda. The focus was on Millennium Development Goal achievements and the next steps for poverty, health, equality and sustainability...

(Photo: AzuKo)

(Photo: AzuKo)

There was a lot of interest in our promotional material and it was equally fascinating to hear the experience of other NGOs including Engineers Without Borders UK, Greenpeace, International Voluntary Service, Christian Aid, FairTrade, Positive Money and Volunteer West Africa. The eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) "form a blueprint agreed to by all the world’s countries and leading development institutions. They have galvanized unprecedented efforts to meet the needs of the world’s poorest." - United Nations

In the latest report, Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary-General states that,

the MDGs have made a profound difference in people’s lives. Global poverty has been halved five years ahead of the 2015 timeframe…

but more needs to be done to accelerate progress. We need bolder and focused action where significant gaps and disparities exist. Member States are now fully engaged in discussions to define Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which will serve as the core of a universal post-2015 development agenda.

One of the highlights of the event was Sophie Verbis' lecture, ‘The SDGs and Post 2015 Debate - the Current Stand on Education'. Sophie (from GIZ) outlined the progress of the Open Working Group, with a particular focus on education. One of the key elements of the SDGs is the three year inclusive process employed to develop the goals which are designed to leave no unfinished business - everything should be complete by 2030 and the targets should be specific. 

Currently, the Open Working Group proposal is for 17 main goals (goal 11 - make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable), further subdivided into measurable aims. Within these goals, specific and measurable targets are proposed such as:

  • By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day

  • By 2030, increase by [x] percent the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship

  • By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and aff­ordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums

  • Support least developed countries, including through financial and technical assistance, in building sustainable and resilient buildings utilising local materials

Monitoring, transparency and evaluation are given more weight within the MDGs, although it has not yet been specified who will monitor them and, if countries don’t comply, what are the consequences? Another criticism rests on targets which focus on quantity (x%) rather than qualityTypically funding streams demand these performance based objectives. In Tanzania for example, health visits reached the 100% target yet each visit lasted only two minutes. The focus remained on quantity and outputs, not the quality or outcomes for people. This raises the question as to whether we are setting ourselves up for failure in 2030?

We should be measuring what is valuable rather than valuing what is measurable. 

Other key speakers included Konstantinos ‘Kostas’ KazakosResearch Associate in the Digital Interaction Group at Culture Lab and Sugata MitraProfessor of Educational Technology at the School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences who beamed in from Delhi to discuss Self Organised Learning Environments.

It was a jam packed weekend and I'd thoroughly recommend signing up to next year's event!

 

Author: C. Russell

Think equality

The face of equality takes many forms... political equality, equality of opportunity, treatment, membership and perhaps more controversially equality of outcome. If this state of being equal is a core value in the democratic tradition, does it follow that the responsibility to achieve it lies in a collective determination?

How then can the architectural process contribute, indeed should it seek to?

(Photo: J. Ashbridge)

(Photo: J. Ashbridge)

Once hailed as a master craftsman, an age of humility is dawning. The role of the architect continues to evolve and a growing underbelly is challenging all we hold to be true. Has the profession focused on providing design services for the top percentile for too long? Can the sector reclaim a sense of social responsibility and if so what methodologies should be celebrated?

Architecture, good architecture, is not about the end product. It is not about a series of components eloquently assembled. It is the life that pervades around it and the sense of community created in and through the design thinking, which brings the object to life.

A shift in process is required. The power of architecture can be realised if citizens take ownership – the architect as the facilitator; the client as the agent of change.

The architectural process begins well before pencil meets paper. Engagement with the end user is essential to understanding real needs. In Mumbai for example, non-governmental organisation SPARC seeks to mobilise pavement and slum dwellers, equipping groups with the tools they need to articulate their concerns and create collective solutions. The once invisible urban poor are supported in direct negotiations with the government, cementing their right to the city.

Early design development is all too often resigned to brief discussions and back of house iterations. A human-centred design approach incorporates a myriad of tools, which bring architecture back to the public domain and in doing so support capacity building. For example, community workshops running in parallel to the design journey are a key aspect of SAFE’s work. This small Bangladeshi organisation strives for replication of improved construction techniques in an area on the frontline of climate change. With limited funding, their projects will only be successful if information is disseminated widely, if ideas are presented in a culturally sensitive manner and if the local population chooses to engage. It is not enough to provide a handful of families’ access to adequate shelter. The vision must empower the wider community.

Similarly, the construction phase itself provides an opportunity to leverage the local economy and offer a level playing field irrespective of ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality or disability. How can we fail to be inspired by the achievements of MASS Design Group’s master mason Anne Marie Nyiranshimiyimana in Rwanda or Orkidstudio’s construction worker Hellen Nyambura Kamau in Kenya? These women fly in the face of disparity.

The potential of architecture is not limited to traditions taught in school. Those who think outside the framework see a new way. True collaboration will allow us to break through the walls and expand the definition.

Think beyond the building. Think equality.

 

Author: J. Ashbridge